Chapter 6 Reprojecting geographic data
- This chapter requires the following packages (lwgeom is also used, but does not need to be attached):
Section 2.4 introduced coordinate reference systems (CRSs) and demonstrated their importance. This chapter goes further. It highlights issues that can arise when using inappropriate CRSs and how to transform data from one CRS to another.
As illustrated in Figure 2.1, there are two types of CRSs: geographic (‘lon/lat’, with units in degrees longitude and latitude) and projected (typically with units of meters from a datum).
This has consequences.
Many geometry operations in sf, for example, assume their inputs have a projected CRS, because the GEOS functions they are based on assume projected data.
To deal with this issue sf provides the function
st_is_longlat() to check.
In some cases the CRS is unknown, as shown below using the example of London introduced in Section 2.2:
This shows that unless a CRS is manually specified or is loaded from a source that has CRS metadata, the CRS is
A CRS can be added to
sf objects with
st_set_crs() as follows:24
Datasets without a specified CRS can cause problems.
An example is provided below, which creates a buffer of one unit around
london_buff_no_crs = st_buffer(london, dist = 1) london_buff = st_buffer(london_geo, dist = 1) #> Warning in st_buffer.sfc(st_geometry(x), dist, nQuadSegs, endCapStyle = #> endCapStyle, : st_buffer does not correctly buffer longitude/latitude data #> dist is assumed to be in decimal degrees (arc_degrees).
Only the second operation generates a warning.
The warning message is useful, telling us that the result may be of limited use because it is in units of latitude and longitude, rather than meters or some other suitable measure of distance assumed by
The consequences of a failure to work on projected data are illustrated in Figure 6.1 (left panel):
the buffer is elongated in the north-south direction because lines of longitude converge towards the Earth’s poles.
geosphere::distGeo(c(0, 0), c(1, 0))to find the precise distance). This shrinks to zero at the poles. At the latitude of London, for example, meridians are less than 70 km apart (challenge: execute code that verifies this). Lines of latitude, by contrast, are equidistant from each other irrespective of latitude: they are always around 111 km apart, including at the equator and near the poles (see Figures 6.1 to 6.3).
Do not interpret the warning about the geographic (
longitude/latitude) CRS as “the CRS should not be set”: it almost always should be!
It is better understood as a suggestion to reproject the data onto a projected CRS.
This suggestion does not always need to be heeded: performing spatial and geometric operations makes little or no difference in some cases (e.g., spatial subsetting).
But for operations involving distances such as buffering, the only way to ensure a good result is to create a projected copy of the data and run the operation on that.
This is done in the code chunk below:
The result is a new object that is identical to
london, but reprojected onto a suitable CRS (the British National Grid, which has an EPSG code of 27700 in this case) that has units of meters.
We can verify that the CRS has changed using
st_crs() as follows (some of the output has been replaced by
Notable components of this CRS description include the EPSG code (
EPSG: 27700), the projection (transverse Mercator,
+proj=tmerc), the origin (
+lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2) and units (
The fact that the units of the CRS are meters (rather than degrees) tells us that this is a projected CRS:
st_is_longlat(london_proj) now returns
FALSE and geometry operations on
london_proj will work without a warning, meaning buffers can be produced from it using proper units of distance.
As pointed out above, moving one degree means moving a bit more than 111 km at the equator (to be precise: 111,320 meters).
This is used as the new buffer distance:
The result in Figure 6.1 (right panel) shows that buffers based on a projected CRS are not distorted: every part of the buffer’s border is equidistant to London.
The importance of CRSs (primarily whether they are projected or geographic) has been demonstrated using the example of London. The subsequent sections go into more depth, exploring which CRS to use and the details of reprojecting vector and raster objects.
6.2 When to reproject?
The previous section showed how to set the CRS manually, with
In real world applications, however, CRSs are usually set automatically when data is read-in.
The main task involving CRSs is often to transform objects, from one CRS into another.
But when should data be transformed? And into which CRS?
There are no clear-cut answers to these questions and CRS selection always involves trade-offs (Maling 1992).
However, there are some general principles provided in this section that can help you decide.
First it’s worth considering when to transform.
In some cases transformation to a projected CRS is essential, such as when using geometric functions such as
st_buffer(), as Figure 6.1 showed.
Conversely, publishing data online with the leaflet package may require a geographic CRS.
Another case is when two objects with different CRSs must be compared or combined, as shown when we try to find the distance between two objects with different CRSs:
To make the
london_proj objects geographically comparable one of them must be transformed into the CRS of the other.
But which CRS to use?
The answer is usually ‘to the projected CRS’, which in this case is the British National Grid (EPSG:27700):
Now that a transformed version of
london has been created, using the sf function
st_transform(), the distance between the two representations of London can be found.
It may come as a surprise that
london2 are just over 2 km apart!26
6.3 Which CRS to use?
The question of which CRS is tricky, and there is rarely a ‘right’ answer: “There exist no all-purpose projections, all involve distortion when far from the center of the specified frame” (Bivand, Pebesma, and Gómez-Rubio 2013).
For geographic CRSs, the answer is often WGS84, not only for web mapping, but also because GPS datasets and thousands of raster and vector datasets are provided in this CRS by default. WGS84 is the most common CRS in the world, so it is worth knowing its EPSG code: 4326. This ‘magic number’ can be used to convert objects with unusual projected CRSs into something that is widely understood.
What about when a projected CRS is required?
In some cases, it is not something that we are free to decide:
“often the choice of projection is made by a public mapping agency” (Bivand, Pebesma, and Gómez-Rubio 2013).
This means that when working with local data sources, it is likely preferable to work with the CRS in which the data was provided, to ensure compatibility, even if the official CRS is not the most accurate.
The example of London was easy to answer because (a) the British National Grid (with its associated EPSG code 27700) is well known and (b) the original dataset (
london) already had that CRS.
In cases where an appropriate CRS is not immediately clear, the choice of CRS should depend on the properties that are most important to preserve in the subsequent maps and analysis. All CRSs are either equal-area, equidistant, conformal (with shapes remaining unchanged), or some combination of compromises of those. Custom CRSs with local parameters can be created for a region of interest and multiple CRSs can be used in projects when no single CRS suits all tasks. ‘Geodesic calculations’ can provide a fall-back if no CRSs are appropriate (see proj.org/geodesic.html). Regardless of the projected CRS used, the results may not be accurate for geometries covering hundreds of kilometers.
When deciding on a custom CRS, we recommend the following:27
- A Lambert azimuthal equal-area (LAEA) projection for a custom local projection (set
lat_0to the center of the study area), which is an equal-area projection at all locations but distorts shapes beyond thousands of kilometres
- Azimuthal equidistant (AEQD) projections for a specifically accurate straight-line distance between a point and the centre point of the local projection
- Lambert conformal conic (LCC) projections for regions covering thousands of kilometres, with the cone set to keep distance and area properties reasonable between the secant lines
- Stereographic (STERE) projections for polar regions, but taking care not to rely on area and distance calculations thousands of kilometres from the center
A commonly used default is Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), a set of CRSs that divides the Earth into 60 longitudinal wedges and 20 latitudinal segments. The transverse Mercator projection used by UTM CRSs is conformal but distorts areas and distances with increasing severity with distance from the center of the UTM zone. Documentation from the GIS software Manifold therefore suggests restricting the longitudinal extent of projects using UTM zones to 6 degrees from the central meridian (source: manifold.net).
Almost every place on Earth has a UTM code, such as “60H” which refers to northern New Zealand where R was invented. All UTM projections have the same datum (WGS84) and their EPSG codes run sequentially from 32601 to 32660 for northern hemisphere locations and from 32701 to 32760 for southern hemisphere locations.
To show how the system works, let’s create a function,
lonlat2UTM() to calculate the EPSG code associated with any point on the planet as follows:
The following command uses this function to identify the UTM zone and associated EPSG code for Auckland and London:
Maps of UTM zones such as that provided by dmap.co.uk confirm that London is in UTM zone 30U.
Another approach to automatically select a projected CRS specific to a local dataset is to create an azimuthal equidistant (AEQD) projection for the center-point of the study area. This involves creating a custom CRS (with no EPSG code) with units of meters based on the centerpoint of a dataset. This approach should be used with caution: no other datasets will be compatible with the custom CRS created and results may not be accurate when used on extensive datasets covering hundreds of kilometers.
The principles outlined in this section apply equally to vector and raster datasets. Some features of CRS transformation however are unique to each geographic data model. We will cover the particularities of vector data transformation in Section 6.4 and those of raster transformation in Section 6.6.
6.4 Reprojecting vector geometries
Chapter 2 demonstrated how vector geometries are made-up of points, and how points form the basis of more complex objects such as lines and polygons.
Reprojecting vectors thus consists of transforming the coordinates of these points.
This is illustrated by
sf object from spData that represents cycle hire locations across London.
The previous section showed how the CRS of vector data can be queried with
Although the output of this function is printed as a single entity, the result is in fact a named list of class
crs, with names
proj4string (which contains full details of the CRS) and
epsg for its code.
This is demonstrated below:
This duality of CRS objects means that they can be set either using an EPSG code or a
This means that
st_crs("+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs") is equivalent to
st_crs(4326), although not all
proj4strings have an associated EPSG code.
Both elements of the CRS are changed by transforming the object to a projected CRS:
The resulting object has a new CRS with an EPSG code 27700. But how to find out more details about this EPSG code, or any code? One option is to search for it online. Another option is to use a function from the rgdal package to find the name of the CRS:
The result shows that the EPSG code 27700 represents the British National Grid, a result that could have been found by searching online for “EPSG 27700”.
But what about the
proj4strings are text strings that describe the CRS.
They can be seen as formulas for converting a projected point into a point on the surface of the Earth and can be accessed from
crs objects as follows (see proj.org/ for further details of what the output means):
st_crsfunction, for example,
6.5 Modifying map projections
Established CRSs captured by EPSG codes are well-suited for many applications.
However in some cases it is desirable to create a new CRS, using a custom
This system allows a very wide range of projections to be created, as we’ll see in some of the custom map projections in this section.
A long and growing list of projections has been developed and many of these can be set with the
+proj= element of
When mapping the world while preserving area relationships, the Mollweide projection is a good choice (Jenny et al. 2017) (Figure 6.2).
To use this projection, we need to specify it using the
"+proj=moll", in the
On the other hand, when mapping the world, it is often desirable to have as little distortion as possible for all spatial properties (area, direction, distance).
One of the most popular projections to achieve this is the Winkel tripel projection (Figure 6.3).29
st_transform_proj() from the lwgeom package allows for coordinate transformations to a wide range of CRSs, including the Winkel tripel projection:
st_transformfunction uses the GDAL interface to PROJ, while
sf_project()(which works with two-column numeric matrices, representing points) and
lwgeom::st_transform_proj()use the PROJ API directly. The first one is appropriate for most situations, and provides a set of the most often used parameters and well-defined transformations. The next one allows for greater customization of a projection, which includes cases when some of the PROJ parameters (e.g.,
+over) or projection (
+proj=wintri) is not available in
Moreover, PROJ parameters can be modified in most CRS definitions.
The below code transforms the coordinates to the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection centered on longitude and latitude of
0 (Figure 6.4).
We can change the PROJ parameters, for example the center of the projection, using the
The code below gives the map centered on New York City (Figure 6.5).
More information on CRS modifications can be found in the Using PROJ documentation.
6.6 Reprojecting raster geometries
The projection concepts described in the previous section apply equally to rasters. However, there are important differences in reprojection of vectors and rasters: transforming a vector object involves changing the coordinates of every vertex but this does not apply to raster data. Rasters are composed of rectangular cells of the same size (expressed by map units, such as degrees or meters), so it is impossible to transform coordinates of pixels separately. Raster reprojection involves creating a new raster object, often with a different number of columns and rows than the original. The attributes must subsequently be re-estimated, allowing the new pixels to be ‘filled’ with appropriate values. In other words, raster reprojection can be thought of as two separate spatial operations: a vector reprojection of cell centroids to another CRS (Section 6.4), and computation of new pixel values through resampling (Section 5.3.3). Thus in most cases when both raster and vector data are used, it is better to avoid reprojecting rasters and reproject vectors instead.
The raster reprojection process is done with
projectRaster() from the raster package.
st_transform() function demonstrated in the previous section,
projectRaster() takes a geographic object (a raster dataset in this case) and a
projectRaster() only accepts the lengthy
proj4string definitions of a CRS rather than concise EPSG codes.
"+init=epsg:MY_NUMBER". For example, one can use the
"+init=epsg:4326"definition to set CRS to WGS84 (EPSG code of 4326). The PROJ library automatically adds the rest of the parameters and converts them into
"+init=epsg:4326 +proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0".
Let’s take a look at two examples of raster transformation: using categorical and continuous data.
Land cover data are usually represented by categorical maps.
nlcd2011.tif file provides information for a small area in Utah, USA obtained from National Land Cover Database 2011 in the NAD83 / UTM zone 12N CRS.
In this region, 14 land cover classes were distinguished (a full list of NLCD2011 land cover classes can be found at mrlc.gov):
When reprojecting categorical rasters, the estimated values must be the same as those of the original.
This could be done using the nearest neighbor method (
This method sets each new cell value to the value of the nearest cell (center) of the input raster.
An example is reprojecting
cat_raster to WGS84, a geographic CRS well suited for web mapping.
The first step is to obtain the PROJ definition of this CRS, which can be done using the http://spatialreference.org webpage.
The final step is to reproject the raster with the
projectRaster() function which, in the case of categorical data, uses the nearest neighbor method (
Many properties of the new object differ from the previous one, including the number of columns and rows (and therefore number of cells), resolution (transformed from meters into degrees), and extent, as illustrated in Table 6.1 (note that the number of categories increases from 14 to 15 because of the addition of
NA values, not because a new category has been created — the land cover classes are preserved).
Reprojecting numeric rasters (with
numeric or in this case
integer values) follows an almost identical procedure.
This is demonstrated below with
srtm.tif in spDataLarge from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), which represents height in meters above sea level (elevation) with the WGS84 CRS:
We will reproject this dataset into a projected CRS, but not with the nearest neighbor method which is appropriate for categorical data.
Instead, we will use the bilinear method which computes the output cell value based on the four nearest cells in the original raster.
The values in the projected dataset are the distance-weighted average of the values from these four cells:
the closer the input cell is to the center of the output cell, the greater its weight.
The following commands create a text string representing the Oblique Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection, and reproject the raster into this CRS, using the
Raster reprojection on numeric variables also leads to small changes to values and spatial properties, such as the number of cells, resolution, and extent. These changes are demonstrated in Table 6.230:
There is more to learn about CRSs. An excellent resource in this area, also implemented in R, is the website R Spatial. Chapter 6 for this free online book is recommended reading — see: rspatial.org/spatial/6-crs.html
- Create a new object called
nzobject into the WGS84 CRS.
- Create an object of class
crsfor both and use this to query their CRSs.
- With reference to the bounding box of each object, what units does each CRS use?
- Remove the CRS from
nz_wgsand plot the result: what is wrong with this map of New Zealand and why?
- Create an object of class
worlddataset to the transverse Mercator projection (
"+proj=tmerc") and plot the result. What has changed and why? Try to transform it back into WGS 84 and plot the new object. Why does the new object differ from the original one?
Transform the continuous raster (
cat_raster) into WGS 84 using the nearest neighbor interpolation method. What has changed? How does it influence the results?
Transform the categorical raster (
cat_raster) into WGS 84 using the bilinear interpolation method. What has changed? How does it influence the results?
Create your own
proj4string. It should have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area (
laea) projection, the WGS84 ellipsoid, the longitude of projection center of 95 degrees west, the latitude of projection center of 60 degrees north, and its units should be in meters. Next, subset Canada from the
worldobject and transform it into the new projection. Plot and compare a map before and after the transformation.
Bivand, Roger, Edzer J Pebesma, and Virgilio Gómez-Rubio. 2013. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. Vol. 747248717. Springer.
Jenny, Bernhard, Bojan Šavrič, Nicholas D Arnold, Brooke E Marston, and Charles A Preppernau. 2017. “A Guide to Selecting Map Projections for World and Hemisphere Maps.” In Choosing a Map Projection, edited by Miljenko Lapaine and Lynn Usery, 213–28. Springer.
Maling, D. H. 1992. Coordinate Systems and Map Projections. Second. Oxford ; New York: Pergamon Press.