5 Geometric operations

Prerequisites

  • This chapter uses the same packages as Chapter 4 but with the addition of spDataLarge, which was installed in Chapter 2 (lwgeom is also used, but does not need to be loaded):

5.1 Introduction

The previous three chapters have demonstrated how geographic datasets are structured in R (Chapter 2) and how to manipulate them based on their non-geographic attributes (Chapter 3) and spatial properties (Chapter 4). This chapter extends these skills. After reading it — and attempting the exercises at the end — you should understand and have control over the geometry column in sf objects and the geographic location of pixels represented in rasters.

Section 5.3 covers transforming vector geometries with ‘unary’ and ‘binary’ operations. Unary operations work on a single geometry in isolation. This includes simplification (of lines and polygons), the creation of buffers and centroids, and shifting/scaling/rotating single geometries using ‘affine transformations’ (sections 5.3.1 to 5.3.4). Binary transformations modify one geometry based on the shape of another. This includes clipping and geometry unions, covered in sections 5.3.5 and 5.3.6 respectively. Type transformations (from a polygon to a line, for example) are demonstrated in section 5.3.7.

Section 5.4 covers geometric transformations on raster objects. This involves changing the size and number of the underlying pixels, and assigning them new values. It teaches how to change the resolution (also called raster aggregation and disaggregation), the extent and the origin of a raster. These operations are especially useful if one would like to align raster datasets from diverse sources. Aligned raster objects share the same header information, allowing them to be processed using map algebra operations, described in section 4.3.2.

A vital type of geometry transformation is reprojecting from one coordinate reference system (CRS) to another. Because of the importance of reprojection, introduced in Chapter 2, and the fact that it applies to raster and vector geometries alike, it is the topic of the first section in this chapter.

5.2 Reprojecting geographic data

Section 2.3 introduced coordinate reference systems (CRSs) and demonstrated their importance for geocomputation. This section goes further, by demonstrating some problems that can arise when using an inappropriate CRS and how to transform geometries from one CRS to another.

Many spatial operations assume that you are using a projected CRS. The GEOS engine underlying most spatial operations in sf, for example, assumes your data is in a projected CRS. For this reason sf contains a function for checking if geometries have a geographic or projected CRS. This is illustrated below using the example of London introduced in section 2.1, which is created by coercing a data.frame into an sf object (the coords argument specifies the coordinates):

The results show that when geographic data is created from scratch, or is loaded from a source that has no CRS metadata, the CRS is unspecified by default. The CRS can be set with st_set_crs():26

Many spatial operations assume that input vector objects are projected, even when in reality they are not. This can lead to problems, as illustrated by the following code chunk, which creates a buffer of one degree around london:

The message stating that dist is assumed to be in decimal degrees is useful: it warns that the result may be of limited use because it is in units of latitude and longitude, rather than meters or some other suitable measure of distance. The consequences of a failure to work on projected data are illustrated in Figure 5.1 (left panel): the buffer is elongated in the north-south direction because lines of longitude converge towards the Earth’s poles.

The distance between two lines of longitude, called meridians, is around 111 km at the equator (execute geosphere::distGeo(c(0, 0), c(1, 0)) to find the precise distance). This shrinks to zero at the poles. At the latitude of London, for example, meridians are less than 70 km apart (challenge: execute code that verifies this). Lines of latitude, by contrast, have are of constant distance from each other irrespective of latitude: they are always around 111 km apart, including at the equator and near the poles. This is illustrated in Figures 5.1 and 5.3.

Do not interpret the warning about the geographic (longitude/latitude) CRS as “the CRS should not be set”: it almost always should be! It is better understood as a suggestion to reproject the data onto a projected CRS. This suggestion does not always need to be heeded: performing spatial and geometric operations makes little or no difference in some cases (e.g. spatial subsetting). But for operations involving distances such as buffering, the only way to ensure a good result is to create a projected copy of the data and run the operation on that. This is done in the code chunk below:

The result is a new object that is identical to london, but reprojected onto a suitable CRS (the British National Grid, which has an EPSG code of 27700 in this case) that has units of meters. We can verify that the CRS has changed using st_crs() as follows (some of the output has been replace by ...):

Notable components of this CRS description include the EPSG code (EPSG: 27700), the projection (transverse Mercator, +proj=tmerc), the origin (+lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2) and units (+units=m).27 The fact that the units of the CRS are meters (rather than degrees) tells us that this is a projected CRS: st_is_longlat(london_proj) now returns FALSE and geometry operations on london_proj will work without a warning, meaning buffers can be produced from it using proper units of distance. As pointed out above, moving one degree means moving a bit more than 111 km at the equator (to be precise: 111,320 meters; to verify this, check out also geosphere::alongTrackDistance(c(0, 0), c(1, 0), c(1, 0))). This is used as the new buffer distance:

The result in Figure 5.1 (right panel) shows that buffers based on a projected CRS are not distorted: every part of the buffer’s border is equidistant to London.

Buffer on vector represenations of London with a geographic (left) and projected (right) CRS. The circular point represents London and the grey outline represents the outline of the UK.Buffer on vector represenations of London with a geographic (left) and projected (right) CRS. The circular point represents London and the grey outline represents the outline of the UK.

Figure 5.1: Buffer on vector represenations of London with a geographic (left) and projected (right) CRS. The circular point represents London and the grey outline represents the outline of the UK.

The importance of CRSs (primarily whether they are projected or geographic) has been demonstrated using the example of London. The subsequent sections go into more depth, exploring which CRS to use and the details of reprojecting vector and raster objects.

5.2.1 Which CRS to use?

While CRSs can be set manually — as illustrated in the previous section with st_set_crs(london, 4326) — it is more common in real world applications for CRSs to be set automatically when data is read-in. The main task involving CRSs is often to transform objects provided in one CRS into another. But when should data be transformed? And into which CRS? There are no clear-cut answers to these questions and CRS selection always involves trade-offs (Maling 1992). However there are some general principles, provided in this section, that can help decide.

The question of when to transform is easier to answer. In some cases transformation to a projected CRS is essential for geocomputational work. An example is when geometric operations involving distance measurements or area calculations are required. Conversely, if the outputs of a project are to be published in an online map, it may be necessary to convert them to a geographic CRS. If the visualization phase of a project involves publishing results using leaflet via the common format GeoJSON (a common scenario) projected data should probably be transformed to WGS84. Another case is when two objects with different CRSs must be compared or combined: performing a geometric operation on two objects with different CRSs results in an error. This is demonstrated in the code chunk below, which attempts to find the distance between the projected and unprojected versions of london:

To make the london and london_proj objects geographically comparable one of them must be transformed into the CRS of the other. But which CRS to use? The answer is usually ‘to the projected CRS’, which in this case is the British National Grid (BNG, EPSG:27700):

Now that a transformed version of london has been created, using the sf function st_transform(), the distance between the two representations of London can be found. It may come as a surprise that london and london2 are just over 2 km apart!28

The question of which CRS is tricky, and there is often no ‘right’ answer: “There exist no all-purpose projections, all involve distortion when far from the center of the specified frame” (Bivand, Pebesma, and Gómez-Rubio 2013). For geographic CRSs the answer is often WGS84, not only for web mapping (covered in the previous paragraph) but also because GPS datasets and thousands of raster and vector datasets are provided in this CRS by default. WGS84 is the most common CRS in the world, so it is worth knowing its EPSG code: 4326. This ‘magic number’ can be used to convert objects with unusual projected CRSs into something that is widely understood.

What about when a projected CRS is required? In some cases it is not something that we are free to decide: “often the choice of projection is made by a public mapping agency” (Bivand, Pebesma, and Gómez-Rubio 2013). This means that when working with local data sources, it is likely preferable to work with the CRS in which the data was provided, to ensure compatibility, even if the ‘official’ CRS is not the most accurate. The example of London was easy to answer because a) the CRS ‘BNG’ (with its associated EPSG code 27700) is well-known and b) the original dataset (london) already had that CRS.

What about when a projected CRS is needed but the study region lacks a well-known CRS? Again, although there is no universal answer there is a sensible default CRS: Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM). UTM is not actually a single CRS but a system of CRSs that covers the entire world, and breaks it into 60 segments, each containing 6 degrees of longitude. All UTM projections have the same datum (WGS84) and their EPSG codes run sequentially from 32601 to 32660. This makes it possible to create a function (we’ll call it lonlat2UTM) to calculate the EPSG code associated with any point on the planet as follows:29

The following command uses this function to identify the UTM zone and associated EPSG code for London:

As expected by viewing a map of UTM zones (such as that provided by dmap.co.uk), the EPSG code returned refers to UTM zone 30, which would represent a good projected CRS for England if the BNG did not exist.

Another approach to automatically selecting a projected CRS specific to a local dataset is to create an azimuthal equidistant (AEQD) projection for the center-point of the study area. This involves creating a custom CRS (with no EPSG code) with units of meters based on the centrepoint of a dataset. This approach should be used with caution: no other datasets will be compatible with the custom CRS created and results may not be accurate when used on extensive datasets covering hundreds of kilometers.

Although we used vector datasets to illustrate the points outlined in this section, the principles apply equally to raster datasets. The subsequent sections explain features of CRS transformation that are unique to each geographic data model, continuing with vector data in the next section (section 5.2.2) and moving-on to explain how raster transformation is different, in section 5.2.4.

5.2.2 Reprojecting vector geometries

Chapter 2 demonstrated how vector geometries are made-up of points, and how points form the basis of more complex objects such as lines and polygons. Reprojecting vectors thus consists of transforming the coordinates of these points. This is illustrated by cycle_hire_osm, an sf object from spData that represents cycle hire locations across London. The previous section showed how the CRS of vector data can be queried with st_crs(). Although the output of this function is printed as a single entity, the result is in fact a named list of class crs, with names proj4string (which contains full details of the CRS) and epsg for its code. This is demonstrated below:

This duality of CRS objects means that they can be set either using an EPSG code or a proj4string. This means that st_crs("+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs") is equivalent to st_crs(4326), although not all proj4strings have an associated EPSG code. Both elements of the CRS are changed by transforming the object to a projected CRS:

The resulting object has a new CRS with an EPSG code 27700. But how to find out more details about this EPSG code, or any code? One option is to search for it online. Another option is to use a function from the rgdal package to find the name of the CRS:

The result shows that the EPSG code 27700 represents the British National Grid, a result that could have been found by searching online for “EPSG 27700”. But what about the proj4string element? proj4strings are text strings in a particular format the describe the CRS. They can be seen as formulas for converting a projected point into a point on the surface of the Earth and can be accessed from crs objects as follows (see proj4.org for further details of what the output means):

Printing a spatial object in the console, automatically returns its coordinate reference system. To access and modify it explicitly, use the st_crs function, for example, st_crs(cycle_hire_osm).

5.2.3 Modifying map projections

Established CRSs captured by EPSG codes are well-suited for many applications. However in some cases it is desirable to create a new CRS, using a custom proj4string. This system allows a very wide range of projections to be created, as we’ll see in some of the custom map projections in this section.

A long and growing list of projections has been developed and many of these these can be set with the +proj= element of proj4strings.30 When mapping the world while preserving areal relationships, the Mollweide projection is a good choice (Jenny et al. 2017) (Figure 5.2). To use this projection, we need to specify it using the proj4string element, "+proj=moll", in the st_transform function:

Mollweide projection of the world.

Figure 5.2: Mollweide projection of the world.

On the other hand, when mapping the world, it is often desirable to have as little distortion as possible for all spatial properties (area, direction, distance). One of the most popular projections to achieve this is the Winkel tripel projection (Figure 5.3).31 st_transform_proj() from the lwgeom package allows for coordinate transformations to a wide range of CRSs, including the Winkel tripel projection:

Winkel tripel projection of the world.

Figure 5.3: Winkel tripel projection of the world.

The two main functions for transformation of simple features coordinates are sf::st_transform() and sf::sf_project(). The st_transform function uses the GDAL interface to PROJ.4, while sf_project() (which works with two-column numeric matrices, representing points) and lwgeom::st_transform_proj() use the PROJ.4 API directly. The first one is appropriate for most situations, and provides a set of the most often used parameters and well defined transformations. The second one allows for greater customization of a projection, which includes cases when some of the PROJ.4 parameters (e.g., +over) or projection (+proj=wintri) is not available in st_transform().

Moreover, PROJ.4 parameters can be modified in most CRS definitions. The below code transforms the coordinates to the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection centered on longitude and latitude of 0 (Figure 5.4).

Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection of the world centered on longitude and latitude of 0.

Figure 5.4: Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection of the world centered on longitude and latitude of 0.

We can change the PROJ.4 parameters, for example the center of the projection using the +lon_0 and +lat_0 parameters. The code below gives the map centered on New York City (Figure 5.5).

Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection of the world centered on New York City.

Figure 5.5: Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection of the world centered on New York City.

More information on CRS modifications can be found in the Using PROJ.4 documentation.

5.2.4 Reprojecting raster geometries

The projection concepts described in the previous section apply equally to rasters. However, there are important differences in reprojection of vectors and rasters: transforming a vector object involves changing the coordinates of every vertex but this does not apply to raster data. Rasters are composed of rectangular cells of the same size (expressed by map units, such as degrees or meters), so it is impossible to transform coordinates of pixels separately.

Raster reprojection involves creating a new raster object, often with a different number of columns and rows than the original. The attributes must subsequently be re-estimated, allowing the new pixels to be ‘filled’ with appropriate values. This two-stage process is done with projectRaster() from the raster package. Like the st_transform() function demonstrated in the previous section, projectRaster() takes a geographic object (a raster dataset in this case) and a crs argument. However, projectRaster() only accepts the lengthy proj4string definitions of a CRS rather than concise EPSG codes.

It is possible to use a EPSG code in a proj4string definition with "+init=epsg:MY_NUMBER". For example, one can use the "+init=epsg:4326" definition to set CRS to WGS84 (EPSG code of 4326). The PROJ.4 library automatically adds the rest of parameters and converts it into "+init=epsg:4326 +proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0",

Let’s take a look at two examples of raster transformation - using categorical and continuous data. Land cover data are usually represented by categorical maps. The nlcd2011.tif file provides information for a small area in Utah, USA obtained from National Land Cover Database 2011 in the NAD83 / UTM zone 12N CRS.

In this region, 14 land cover classes were distinguished32:

When reprojecting categorical raster, we need to ensure that our new estimated values would still have values of our original classes. This could be done using the nearest neighbor method (ngb). In this method, value of the output cell is calculated based on the nearest cell center of the input raster.

For example, we want to change the CRS to WGS 84. It can be desired when we want to visualize a raster data on top of a web basemap, such as the Google or OpenStreetMap map tiles. The first step is to obtain the proj4 definition of this CRS, which can be done using the http://spatialreference.org webpage. The second and last step is to define the reprojection method in the projectRaster() function, which in case of categorical data is the nearest neighbor method (ngb):

Many properties of the new object differ from the previous one, which include the number of columns and rows (and therefore number of cells), resolution (transformed from meters into degrees), and extent, as illustrated in Table 5.1 (note that the number of categories increases from 14 to 15 because of the addition of NA values, not because a new category has been created — the land cover classes are preserved).

Table 5.1: Key attributes in the original and projected categorical raster datasets.
CRS nrow ncol ncell resolution unique_categories
NAD83 1359 1073 1458207 31.5275 14
WGS84 1394 1111 1548734 0.0003 15

Reprojecting raster data with continuous (numeric or in this case integer) values follows an almost identical procedure. srtm.tif in spDataLarge contains a digital elevation model from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) representing height above sea level (elevation) in meters. Its CRS is WGS84:

We will reproject this dataset into a projected CRS, but not with the nearest neighbor method which is appropriate for categorical data. Instead we will use the bilinear method which computes the output cell value based on the four nearest cells in the original raster. The values in the projected dataset are the distance-weighted average of the values from these four cells: the closer the input cell is to the center of the output cell, the greater its weight. The following commands create a text string representing the Oblique Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection, and reproject the raster into this CRS, using the bilinear method:

Raster reprojection on numeric variables also leads to small changes values and spatial properties, such as the number of cells, resolution, and extent. These changes are demonstrated in Table 5.233:

Table 5.2: Key attributes original and projected continuous (numeric) raster datasets.
CRS nrow ncol ncell resolution mean
WGS84 457 465 212505 31.5275 1843
Equal-area 467 478 223226 0.0003 1842
Of course, the limitations of 2D Earth projections apply as much to vector as to raster data. At best we can comply with two out of three spatial properties (distance, area, direction). Therefore, the task at hand determines which projection to choose. For instance, if we are interested in a density (points per grid cell or inhabitants per grid cell) we should use an equal-area projection (see also chapter 8).

5.3 Geometric operations on vector data

This section is about operations that in some way change the geometry of vector (sf) objects. It is more advanced than the spatial data operations presented in the previous chapter (in section 4.2) because here we drill down into the geometry: the functions discussed in this section work on objects of class sfc in addition to objects of class sf.

5.3.1 Simplification

Simplification is a process for generalization of vector objects (lines and polygons) usually for use in smaller scale maps. Another reason for simplifying objects is to reduce the amount of memory, disk space and network bandwidth they consume: it may be wise to simplify complex geometries before publishing them as interactive maps. The sf package provides st_simplify(), which uses the GEOS implementation of the Douglas-Peucker algorithm to reduce the vertex count. st_simplify() uses the dTolerance to control the level of generalization in map units (see Douglas and Peucker 1973 for details). Figure 5.6 illustrates simplification of a LINESTRING geometry representing the river Seine and tributaries. The simplified geometry was created by the following command:

Comparison of the original and simplified `seine` geometry.

Figure 5.6: Comparison of the original and simplified seine geometry.

The resulting seine_simp object is a copy of the original seine but with fewer vertices. This is apparent, with the result being visually simpler (Figure 5.6, right) and consuming less memory than the original object, as verified below:

Simplification is also applicable for polygons. This is illustrated using us_states, representing the contiguous United States. As we showed in section 5.2, GEOS assumes that the data is in a projected CRS and this could lead to unexpected results when using a geographic CRS. Therefore, the first step is to project the data into some adequate projected CRS, such as US National Atlas Equal Area (epsg = 2163) (on the left in Figure 5.7):

st_simplify() works equally well with projected polygons:

A limitation with st_simplify() is that it simplifies objects on a per-geometry basis. This means the ‘topology’ is lost, resulting in overlapping and ‘holy’ areal units illustrated in Figure 5.7 (middle panel). ms_simplify() from rmapshaper provides an alternative that overcomes this issue. By default it uses the Visvalingam algorithm, which overcomes some limitations of the Douglas-Peucker algorithm (Visvalingam and Whyatt 1993). The following code chunk uses this function to simplify us_states2163. The result has only 1% of the vertices of the input (set using the argument keep) but its number of objects remains intact because we set keep_shapes = TRUE34:

Finally, the visual comparison of the original dataset and the two simplified versions shows differences between the Douglas-Peucker (st_simplify) and Visvalingam (ms_simplify) algorithm outputs (Figure 5.7):

Polygon simplification in action, comparing the original geometry of the contiguous United States with simplified versions, generated with functions from **sf** (center) and **rmapshaper** (right) packages.

Figure 5.7: Polygon simplification in action, comparing the original geometry of the contiguous United States with simplified versions, generated with functions from sf (center) and rmapshaper (right) packages.

5.3.2 Centroids

There are two main functions that create single point representations of more complex vector objects - st_centroid() and st_point_on_surface().

The st_centroid() function calculates the geometric center of a geometry. We can create centroids for polygons, lines (see black points on Figure 5.8) and multipoints:

Centroids could be useful to represent more complex objects - lines and polygons, for example to calculate distances between centers of polygons. They are also often used as places where polygons or lines labels are put. However, it is important to know that centroids could be located outside of the given object, e.g. in cases of irregular shaped polygons or lines. Examples of this can be seen on the right plot on Figure 5.8.

Alternatively, the st_point_on_surface() can be used.

This ensures that the created point lies on the given object (see red points on Figure 5.8).

Centroids (black points) and 'points on surface' (red points) of New Zeleand's regions (left) and the Seine (right) datasets.

Figure 5.8: Centroids (black points) and ‘points on surface’ (red points) of New Zeleand’s regions (left) and the Seine (right) datasets.

5.3.3 Buffers

Buffers are polygons representing the area within a given distance of a geometric feature: regardless of whether the input is a point, line or polygon, the output is polygon. Unlike simplification (which is often used for visualization and reducing file size) buffering tends to be used for geographic data analysis. How many points are within a given distance of this line? Which demographic groups are within travel distance of this new shop? These kinds of questions can be answered and visualized by creating buffers around the geographic entities of interest.

Figure 5.9 illustrates buffers of different sizes (5 and 20 km) surrounding the river Seine and tributaries. These buffers were created with commands below, which show that the command st_buffer() requires at least two arguments: an input geometry and a distance:

Buffers around the `seine` datasets of 5km (left) and 50km (right). Note the colors, which reflect the fact that one buffer is created per geometry feature.Buffers around the `seine` datasets of 5km (left) and 50km (right). Note the colors, which reflect the fact that one buffer is created per geometry feature.

Figure 5.9: Buffers around the seine datasets of 5km (left) and 50km (right). Note the colors, which reflect the fact that one buffer is created per geometry feature.

The third and final argument of st_buffer() is nQuadSegs, which means ‘number of segments per quadrant’ and is set by default to 30 (meaning circles created by buffers are composed of \(4 \times 30 = 120\) lines). This argument rarely needs be set. Unusual cases where it may be useful include when the memory consumed by the output of a buffer operation is a major concern (in which case it should be reduced) or when very high precision is needed (in which case it should be increased).

5.3.4 Affine transformations

Affine transformation is any transformation that preserves lines and parallelism. However, angles or length are not necessarily preserved. Affine transformations include, among others, shifting (translation), scaling and rotation. Additionally, it is possible to use any combination of these. Affine transformations are an essential part of geocomputation, e.g. when reprojecting or when improving the geometry of a vector dataset that was created based on a distorted or wrongly projected map.

The sf package implements affine transformation for objects of classes sfg and sfc.

Shifting moves every point by the same distance in map units. It could be done by adding a numerical vector to a vector object. For example, the code below shifts all y-coordinates by 100,000 meters to the north but leaves the x-coordinates untouched (left panel on the Fig. 5.10).

Scaling enlarges or shrinks objects by a factor. It can be applied either globally or locally. Global scaling increases or decreases all coordinates values in relation to the origin coordinates, while keeping all geometries topological relations intact. It can by done by subtraction or multiplication of asfg or sfc object.

Local scaling treats geometries independently and requires points around which geometries are going to be scaled, e.g. centroids. In the example below, each geometry is shrunk by a factor of two around the centroids (central panel on the Fig. 5.10).

Rotation of two-dimensional coordinates requires a rotation matrix:

\[ R = \begin{bmatrix} \cos \theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & \cos \theta \\ \end{bmatrix} \]

It rotates points in a counterclockwise direction. The rotation matrix could be implemented in R as:

The rotation function accepts one argument a - a rotation angle in degrees. Rotation could be done around selected points, such as centroids (right panel on the Fig. 5.10). See vignette("sf3") for more examples.

Illustrations of affine transformations: shift, scale and rotate.

Figure 5.10: Illustrations of affine transformations: shift, scale and rotate.

Finally, the newly created geometries can replace the old ones with the st_set_geometry() function:

5.3.5 Clipping

Spatial clipping is a form of spatial subsetting that involves changes to the geometry columns of at least some of the affected features.

Clipping can only apply to features more complex than points: lines, polygons and their ‘multi’ equivalents. To illustrate the concept we will start with a simple example: two overlapping circles with a center point one unit away from each other and a radius of one:

Overlapping circles.

Figure 5.11: Overlapping circles.

Imagine you want to select not one circle or the other, but the space covered by both x and y. This can be done using the function st_intersection(), illustrated using objects named x and y which represent the left and right-hand circles:

The subsequent code chunk demonstrates how this works for all combinations of the ‘Venn’ diagram representing x and y, inspired by Figure 5.1 of the book R for Data Science (Grolemund and Wickham 2016).

Spatial equivalents of logical operators.

Figure 5.12: Spatial equivalents of logical operators.

To illustrate the relationship between subsetting and clipping spatial data, we will subset points that cover the bounding box of the circles x and y in Figure 5.12. Some points will be inside just one circle, some will be inside both and some will be inside neither.

There are two different ways to subset points that fit into combinations of the circles: via clipping and logical operators. But first we must generate some points. We will use the simple random sampling strategy to sample from a box representing the extent of x and y using the sf function st_sample(). This generates objects plotted in Figure 5.13:

Randomly distributed points within the bounding box enclosing circles x and y.

Figure 5.13: Randomly distributed points within the bounding box enclosing circles x and y.

5.3.6 Geometry unions

Spatial aggregation can also be done in the tidyverse, using dplyr functions as follows:

Further to what was covered in section 3.2.2, aggregation of polygons often silently dissolves the geometries of touching polygons in the same group. This is demonstrated in the code chunk below, in which the REGION variable in us_states is used to aggregate the states into four regions, illustrated in Figure 5.14:

Spatial aggregation on contiguous polygons, illustrated by aggregating the population of US states into regions, with population represented by color. Note the operation automatically dissolves boundaries between states.

Figure 5.14: Spatial aggregation on contiguous polygons, illustrated by aggregating the population of US states into regions, with population represented by color. Note the operation automatically dissolves boundaries between states.

The equivalent result can be achieved using tidyverse functions as follows (result not shown):

5.3.7 Type transformations

Geometry casting is a powerful operation which enables transformation of the geometry type. It is implemented in the st_cast function from the sf package. Importantly, st_cast behaves differently on single simple feature geometry (sfg) objects, simple feature geometry column (sfc) and simple features objects.

Let’s create a multipoint to illustrate how geometry casting works on simple feature geometry (sfg) objects:

In this case, st_cast can be useful to transform the new object into linestring or polygon (Figure 5.15):

Examples of linestring and polygon 'casted' from a multipoint geometry.

Figure 5.15: Examples of linestring and polygon ‘casted’ from a multipoint geometry.

This process can be also reversed using st_cast:

For single simple feature geometries (sfg), st_cast also provides geometry casting from non-multi to multi types (e.g. POINT to MULTIPOINT) and from multi types to non-multi types. However, only the first element of the old object would remain in the second group of cases.

Geometry casting of simple features geometry column (sfc) and simple features objects works the same as for single geometries in most of the cases. One important difference is conversion between multi to non-multi types. As a result of this process, multi-objects are split into many non-multi objects.

We would use a new object, multilinestring_sf, as an example (on the left in Figure 5.16):

You can imagine it as a road or river network. The new object has only one row that defines all the lines. This restricts the number of operations that can be done, for example it prevents adding names to each line segment or calculating lengths of single lines. The st_cast function can be used in this situation, as it separates one mutlilinestring into three linestrings:

Examples of type casting between MULTILINESTRING (left) and LINESTRING (right).

Figure 5.16: Examples of type casting between MULTILINESTRING (left) and LINESTRING (right).

The newly created object allows for attributes creation (see more in section 3.2.4) and length measurements:

5.4 Geometric operations on raster data

Geometric raster operations include the shift, flipping, mirroring, scaling, rotation or warping of images. These operations are e.g. necessary when geolocating a raster image. In turn, geolocating requires the rectification of the image, which includes one or several of the following steps depending on the task at hand (see also Liu and Mason 2009):

  • Georeferencing with ground control points.
  • Orthorectification also georeferences an image but additionally takes into account local topography.
  • Image (co-)registration is the process of aligning one image with another (in terms of CRS, origin and resolution). Registration becomes necessary for images from the same scene but shot from different sensors or from different angles or at different points in time.

In this section we will first show how to change the extent, the resolution and the origin of an image. As mentioned before, most of the times, we need these operations in order to align several images. A matching projection is of course also required but is already covered in section 5.2.4. In any case, there are other reasons why to perform a geometric operation on a single raster image. For instance, in chapter 8 we define metropolitan areas in Germany as 20 km2 pixels with more than 500,000 inhabitants. The original inhabitant raster, however, has a resolution of 1 km2 which is why we will decrease (aggregate) the resolution by a factor of 20 (see section 8.5).

5.4.1 Extent and origin

When merging or performing map algebra on rasters, their resolution, projection, origin and/or extent has to match. Otherwise, how should we add the values of one raster with a resolution of 0.2 decimal degrees to a second with a resolution of 1 decimal degree? The same problem arises when we would like to merge satellite imagery from different sensors with different projections and resolutions. We can deal with such mismatches by aligning the rasters.

In the simplest case, two images only differ in a mismatch in extent. Following code adds one row and two columns to each side of the raster while setting all new values to an elevation of 1000 meters (5.17).

Original raster extended by 1 one row on each side (top, bottom) and two columns on each side (right, left).

Figure 5.17: Original raster extended by 1 one row on each side (top, bottom) and two columns on each side (right, left).

Performing an algebraic operation on two objects with differing extents in R, the raster package returns the result for the intersection, and says so in a warning.

However, we can also align the extent of two rasters with extend(). Instead of telling the function how many rows or columns should be added (as done before), we allow it to figure it out by using another raster object. Here, we extend the elev object to the extent of elev_2. The newly added rows and column receive the default value of the value parameter, i.e. NA.

The origin is the point closest to (0, 0) if you moved towards it in steps of x and y resolution.

If two rasters have different origins, their cells do not overlap completely which would make map algebra impossible. To change the origin , use origin().35 Looking at figure 5.18 reveals the effect of changing the origin.

Plotting rasters with the same values but different origins.

Figure 5.18: Plotting rasters with the same values but different origins.

Note that changing the resolution frequently (next section) also changes the origin.

5.4.2 Aggregation and disaggregation

Raster datasets can also differ with regard to their resolution. To match resolutions, one can either decrease (aggregate()) or increase (disaggregate()) the resolution of one raster.36 As an example, we here change the spatial resolution of elev from 0.5 to 2 decimal degree, that means, we aggregate by a factor of 2 (Fig. 5.19). Additionally, the output cell value should correspond to the mean of the input cells (note that one could use other functions as well, such as median(), sum() etc.):

Original raster (left). Aggregated raster (right).

Figure 5.19: Original raster (left). Aggregated raster (right).

By contrast, thedisaggregate() function increases the resolution. However, we have to specify a method how to fill the new cells. The disaggregate() function provides two methods. The first (nearest neighbor, method = "") simply gives all output cells the value of the nearest input cell, and hence duplicates values which leads to a blocky output image. For example, the four cells building up the upper left cell of the aggregated raster (Fig. 5.19) will retrieve all the same value, namely 4.5.

The bilinear method, in turn, is an interpolation technique that uses the four nearest pixel centers of the input image (salmon colored points in Fig. 5.20) to compute an average weighted by distance (arrows in Fig. 5.20 as the value of the output cell - square in the upper left corner in Fig. 5.20).

The distance-weighted average of the four closest input cells determine the output when using the bilinear method for disaggregation.

Figure 5.20: The distance-weighted average of the four closest input cells determine the output when using the bilinear method for disaggregation.

Comparing the values of elev and elev_disagg tells us that both are identical (you can also use compareRaster() or all.equal()). Please note that the disaggregation only predicted correctly the values at a higher resolution due to our artificial input data set (elev) and the fact that we have used the mean for the aggregation (elev_agg). However, this is usually not to be expected, since disaggregating is a simple interpolation technique. It is important to keep in mind that disaggregating results in a finer resolution, the corresponding values, however, are only as accurate as their lower resolution source.

The process of computing values for new pixel locations is also called resampling. In fact, the raster package provides a resample() function. It lets you align several raster properties in one go, namely origin, extent and resolution. By default, it uses the bilinear-interpolation.

Finally, in order to align many (possibly hundreds or thousands of) images stored on disk, you could use the gdalUtils::align_rasters() function. However, you may also use raster with very large datasets. This is because raster:

  1. Lets you work with raster datasets that are too large to fit into the main memory (RAM) by only processing chunks of it.
  2. Tries to facilitate parallel processing. For more information see the help pages of beginCluster() and clusteR(). Additionally, check out the Multi-core functions section in vignette("functions", package = "raster").

5.5 Exercises

  1. Create a new object called nz_wgs by transforming nz object into the WGS84 CRS.
    • Create an object of class crs for both and use this to query their CRSs.
    • With reference to the bounding box of each object, what units does each CRS use?
    • Remove the CRS from nz_wgs and plot the result: what is wrong with this map of New Zealand and why?
  2. Transform the world dataset to the transverse Mercator projection ("+proj=tmerc") and plot the result. What has changed and why? Try to transform it back into WGS 84 and plot the new object. Why does the new object differ from the original one?

  3. Generate and plot simplified versions of the nz dataset. Experiment with different values of keep (ranging from 0.5 to 0.00005) for ms_simplify() and dTolerance (from 100 to 100,000) st_simplify() .
    • At what value does the form of the result start to break-down for each method, making New Zealand unrecognizable?
    • Advanced: What is different about the geometry type of the results from st_simplify() compared with the geometry type of ms_simplify()? What problems does this create and how can this be resolved?
  4. In the first exercise in Chapter 4 it was established that Canterbury region had 61 of the 101 highest points in New Zealand. Using st_buffer(), how many points in nz_height are within 100 km of Canturbury?

  5. Find the geographic centroid of New Zealand. How far is it from the geographic centroid of Canterbury?

  6. Most world maps have a north-up orientation. A world map with a south-up orientation could be created by a reflection (one of the affine transformations not mentioned in 5.3.4) of the world object’s geometry. Write code to do so. Hint: you need to use a two-element vector for this transformation.
    • Bonus: create a upside down map of your country.
  7. Transform the continuous raster (cat_raster) into WGS 84 using the nearest neighbor interpolation method. What has changed? How does it influence the results?

  8. Transform the categorical raster (cat_raster) into WGS 84 using the bilinear interpolation method. What has changed? How does it influence the results?

  9. Subset the point in p that is contained within x and y (see section 5.3.5 and Figure 5.12).
    • Using base subsetting operators.
    • Using an intermediary object created with st_intersection().
  10. Calculate the length of the boundary lines of US states in meters. Which state has the longest border and which has the shortest? Hint: The st_length function computes the length of a LINESTRING or MULTILINESTRING geometry.

  11. Aggregate the raster counting high points in New Zealand (created in the previous exercise), reduce its geographic resolution by half (so cells are 6 by 6 km) and plot the result.
    • Resample the lower resolution raster back to a resolution of 3 km. How have the results changed?
    • Name two advantages and disadvantages of reducing raster resolution.

References

Maling, D. H. 1992. Coordinate Systems and Map Projections. 2nd ed. Oxford ; New York: Pergamon Press.

Bivand, Roger S., Edzer Pebesma, and Virgilio Gómez-Rubio. 2013. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. 2nd ed. 2013 edition. New York: Springer.

Jenny, Bernhard, Bojan Šavrič, Nicholas D Arnold, Brooke E Marston, and Charles A Preppernau. 2017. “A Guide to Selecting Map Projections for World and Hemisphere Maps.” In Choosing a Map Projection, edited by Miljenko Lapaine and Lynn Usery, 213–28. Springer.

Douglas, David H, and Thomas K Peucker. 1973. “Algorithms for the Reduction of the Number of Points Required to Represent a Digitized Line or Its Caricature.” Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 10 (2): 112–22.

Visvalingam, M., and J. D. Whyatt. 1993. “Line Generalisation by Repeated Elimination of Points.” The Cartographic Journal 30 (1): 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1179/000870493786962263.

Grolemund, Garrett, and Hadley Wickham. 2016. R for Data Science. 1 edition. O’Reilly Media.

Liu, Jian-Guo, and Philippa J. Mason. 2009. Essential Image Processing and GIS for Remote Sensing. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.


  1. The CRS can also be added when creating sf objects with the crs argument (e.g. st_sf(geometry = st_sfc(st_point(c(-0.1, 51.5))), crs = 4326)). The same argument can also be used to set the CRS when creating raster datasets (e.g. raster(crs = "+proj=longlat")).

  2. For a short description of the most relevant projection parameters and related concepts, see the fourth lecture by Jochen Albrecht: geography.hunter.cuny.edu/~jochen/GTECH361/lectures/ as well as http://proj4.org/parameters.html. Another great resource on projection definitions is http://spatialreference.org/.

  3. The difference in location between the two points is not due to imperfections in the transforming operation (which is in fact very accurate) but the low precision of the manually-created coordinates that created london and london_proj. Also surprising may be that the result is provided in a matrix with units of meters. This is because st_distance() can provide distances between many features and because the CRS has units of meters. Use as.numeric() to coerce the result into a regular number.

  4. Thanks to Josh O’Brien who provided the basis for this function in an answer to a question on stackoverflow.

  5. See the Wikepedia page ‘List of map projections’ for 70+ projections, and illustrations.

  6. This projection is used, among others, by the National Geographic Society.

  7. Full list of NLCD2011 land cover classes can be found at https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php

  8. Another minor change, that is not represented in Table 5.2, is that the class of the values in the new projected raster dataset is numeric. This is because the bilinear method works with continuous data and the results are rarely coerced into whole integer values. This can have implications for file sizes when raster datasets are saved.

  9. Simplification of multipolygon objects could remove small internal polygons, even if the keep_shapes argument is set to TRUE. To prevent this, you need to set explode = TRUE. This option converts all mutlipolygons into separate polygons before its simplification.

  10. If the origins of two raster datasets are just marginally apart, it sometimes is sufficient to simply increase the tolerance argument of raster::rasterOptions().

  11. It is important to note that we here are solely referring to the spatial resolution but that in remote sensing the spectral (spectral bands), temporal (observations through time of the same area) and radiometric (color depth) resolution are equally important.